{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":13,"sheets":["T- substantial","concon cp","K","Adv 1","Adv 2","Adv 3","Elections DA","Solvency","esr cp","Romney DA","infra ptix","prez powers","Macros"],"not_rendered":{"macros":1,"defined_names":11},"read":"whole","date_system":"1904"}

{"sheet":"T- substantial","index":0,"n_rows":21,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":21}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
[]
[null,1,"substantial is stupid-arbi"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"MFN exemptions are substantial restrictions on delegated trade powers."]
[]
[null,null,"So are sanctions.\nLinarelli 95 "]
[]
[]
[null,null,"A substantial restriction must eliminate discretion."]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Substantial means of real worth or considerable value."]
[]
[]
[null,null,"intent to define"]
[null,null,"reasonability"]
[null,null,"quant stupid"]
[null,null,"aff flex outweighs"]
[null,null,"functional limits"]

{"sheet":"concon cp","index":1,"n_rows":14,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":14}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["The United States, through a limited constitutional convention called for by at least thirty-four of the States and ratified by at least thirty-eight of the States, should substantially increase restrictions on executive discretion in the implementation of sanctions pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 1978.",null,"can't literally do the aff"]
[null,1]
["Solves and avoids politics \nElving 18 ",null,"policy stability"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"theory"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"perm do both"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"The counterplan links to politics"]

{"sheet":"K","index":2,"n_rows":11,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":11}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
[null,null,"The affirmative focus on disease is representative of the disease securitization mindset where persons are only included or excluded based on their ability to offer meaningful participation.","Weigh the plan against a competitive alt or the status quo – anything else frames out the crux of 1AC offense which disincentivizes fleshed out politico-ethical positions and undermines clash which turns their standards."]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Security logic justifies endless violence, totalitarianism, and nuclear war— vote neg to engage in intellectual criticism of their representations","Perm do both\nPerm – do the aff in the debate space and the alt outside\n"]
[]
[{"$nulls":3},"don't link, not our disease spread"]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":3},"The alternative’s refusal to evaluate impacts feeds into the hands of right-wing deniers"]
[{"$nulls":3},"buell 2k3"]

{"sheet":"Adv 1","index":3,"n_rows":10,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":10}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Illegal hunting guarantees global zoonotic disease spread – increased contact with infected mammals and rat waves.",null,"1. They don’t solve illegal hunting – hunters can always evade sanctions. That’s why black markets exist."]
["That triggers deadly airborne viruses."]
["Illegal bushmeat is key - border checks solve registered meats. Causes AIDS spread, Ebola, and avian flu.",null,"2. Natural pandemics don’t cause extinction\nSandberg 6/11/14 "]
["It only takes one ‘super-spreader’ and globalization overwhelms burnout.\nBar-Yam 16 "]
[]
[null,null,"3. Pharma won’t invest in solving their impacts"]
[]
[]
[null,null,". Global inequality blocks drug access "]

{"sheet":"Adv 2","index":4,"n_rows":15,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":15}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["llegal wildlife trade creates unsustainable hunting practices – biodiversity cascades guarantee imminent extinction."]
["Extinction pulse triggers biological annihilation. This is the best, most recent study – only we assume population declines.\nCeballos et al. 17 ",1]
["Top-down control on ecosystems is key to prevent cascading losses along the food chain – apex species are irreplaceable.\nRipple et al. 16 "]
["Large mammals key to forest regeneration through seed dispersal. It’s a positive feedback loop – overhunting is irreversible.\nNunez-Iturri et al. 8 "]
["Independently, illegal logging drives deforestation. Shifting economic calculus key to government enforcement.\nTacconi 7 "]
["Rainforests are lungs of the earth – deforestation is devastating to global oxygen supply.\nCollins 18 "]
["Accelerated deoxygenation means total extinction.\nMartin et al. 17 ",null,"1. Adaptation and resilience prevents bio-d impacts. ","cascading, aff solvs overhunting"]
["Illegal trading directly enables invasive species takeover – devastates ecosystems through out-competition and disease spread.\nWyler and Sheikh 9 ",null,null,"Any study is an underestimate – shifting baseline effect.\nRipple et al. 16 ("]
[]
[null,null,"2. Even completely unchecked deforestation takes 200 years and won’t cause extinction ","can't adapt in time"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"3. Reforestation destroys biodiversity and increases warming. ","not context, not deliberate reforesting"]

{"sheet":"Adv 3","index":5,"n_rows":8,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":8}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Overhunting of large mammals leave small mammal populations unchecked – that means rat waves. ",null,null,"conflict dampener, something about losoe nukes"]
["Rats decimate crop production and storage.\nWitmer and Shiels 18 ",1,"Food wars are a myth – there’s zero empirical evidence\nSalehyan 7 ","overhutning makes unsutainable"]
["Overhunting ruptures large dung beetles – cascading impact.\nCulot et al. 13 ",null,null,"scope of the shock"]
["Dung beetles are key to global agriculture – nutrient cycling, pest suppression, and dung control. \nNichols 8 ",null,"Alt causes to food shortages – Ebola \nAP 8/16 "]
["Food wars go nuclear – multiple studies.\nFDI 12 "]
["Most likely cause of global conflict – improving security dampens incentives to go to war.\nLehane 17 ",null,"Democracy solves resource scarcity\nSalehyan ","romney da"]
["Overhunting causes mass starvation – immediate economic deterrence through international frameworks key.\nRipple et al. 16 "]

{"sheet":"Elections DA","index":6,"n_rows":15,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":15}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
[null,null,"Trump wins—Democratic party is too divided",null,"paris fails",null,"warming big"]
[{"$nulls":4},"aff mechanism solves warming",null,"perm solves the link"]
[{"$nulls":4},"no defense",null,"vote aff"]
[null,null,"shutdown thump",{"$nulls":3},"circumvention not specific to aff and fiat solves it"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"paris fails","concede"]
[{"$nulls":3},"disproves thesis of aff, intl coop insufficient"]
[]
[null,null,"Defo triggers short-term positive feedbacks."]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Aff creates climate spillover"]

{"sheet":"Solvency","index":7,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":12}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["CITES provides an international framework, but inconsistencies between national laws renders CITES toothless now – reinvigorated international cooperation is key to prevent species extinctions.",null,"Circumvention takes out the aff",null,"can do thing in secret, strong arm something","can't levy sanctions","tech level-they conedd it in the 2ac","1ar responded to new block stuff"]
["After Japan Whaling, power to inflict sanctions was vested in the executive. Conflicts of interest make the executive unreliable – new statutory restrictions are the only way to guarantee automatic sanctions.",{"$nulls":3},"trump is not prone to lashout","secrecy doesn't matter","1ac/2ac don't say oversgiht, plan doesn't mdnate it","this was a new 2nr card that applies to cp"]
["Eliminating discretion in sanctions sends a strong global signal and incentivizes rapid international change.",null,"Trump’s risk averse---no miscalc or lashout.",null,"dropped","secretaies don't circumvent","overisght doesn't check trump-card","courts already ruled"]
["Reframing wildlife trade as mainstream crime is key to generate political will and cooperation. US key to solve – best training and global enforcement.",{"$nulls":4},"card","interp ambiguity means circumvention","we fiat congress, no sanctions"]
["Sanctions generate discourse and mindset shifts – key to conservation.\nParker 1 ",{"$nulls":3},"more circumvention cards","durable fiat solves",null,"there are oversight committes"]
["Equal application of administrative procedures levels the playing field and restores legitimacy.\nHuggins 18 (",{"$nulls":6},"congress showing impetus now"]
["Strong enforcement enables cooperation with subsistence hunters and localized programs – they have interest in protecting species.\nHarrison et al. 16 ",{"$nulls":6},"their card are not about sanctions"]
["Trump’s behavior and erraticism has undermined the credibility of the executive long term – other countries are looking to congress for external repudiation – prevents miscalc and war. \nYarhi-Milo 18",{"$nulls":6},"russia proves they can enforce the plan"]
["A combination of increased ethical awareness and global cooperation is key to prevent broader carnivore decline.\nRipple et al. 14 ",{"$nulls":6},"fiat solves, he can't be secret-nonenforcement is not secret"]
[{"$nulls":7},"warming impact is about cred on 2020"]
[{"$nulls":7},"new sanction model-don't have to use this"]

{"sheet":"esr cp","index":8,"n_rows":41,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":41}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Executive action solves the case. XOs are binding, supreme law – only presidential directives meet that description. The CP has Trump legally bind himself to change his conduct – that reins in and checks Trump. Two net benefits:","congress--other countries don't believe","perm is not fleshed out","stability deficit--exec policy, politcal situation, cred would change a lot"]
[{"$nulls":3},"1. We solve better – XOs are not just procedural but substantive – agencies could defy or circumvent legislative and judicial restrictions but only the president can tie agencies’ hands – that’s White.","change sanctions for polticial purpsoes","all the 1ar arguments are in squo context, dosen't assume fiat","they don't perceive fiat"]
[{"$nulls":3},"2. Any solvency deficit links more to the Aff – Trump thinks the CP is his own genius idea, so he won’t fight it – but the aff is seen as outside meddling which he’ll relentlessly fight against\nJohn Gartner, 8/24/2017","trade wars provide motive-green protectionist",null,"auto sanctions are key"]
[{"$nulls":3},"The executive enforcing sanctions solves credible signaling --- all their 1AC evidence about credible signaling is just about enforcing sanctions already on the books --- the CP obviously solves that","exit credibility--no durable signal",null,"congress is US legitimacy, Trump is protectionism"]
[{"$nulls":3},"2nd plank solves any residual solvency deficit --- Trump’s perceived as saber-rattling against North Korea which muddies signaling --- that was 1AC CX. The CP de-escalates that conflict ","congressional action solves",null,"natioanl emergecny for borders eample"]
[{"$nulls":4},"trump can't do environment stuff-he doesn't believe climate change",null,"no enviro credibility spillover because trump motives suck"]
[]
[null,null,"perm do both","1. The perm links – our DA is about judicial and congressional restrictions.","perm do both solves links to the da's",null,"perm do both--solves link da, trump and congress do together, romney no fight"]
[{"$nulls":3},"2. Perm destroys solvency – it causes confusion, backlash, and rollback of implementation. Trump would viciously attack restrictions from other branches, which causes legal uncertainty and destroys precedent – that’s Gartner."]
[null,null,"Perm solves and CP links to the DA – undermines separation of powers.\nDriesen 91 "]
[]
[]
[{"$nulls":3},"Counter-interpretation --- the negative can fiat executive restrictions."]
[{"$nulls":3},"1. Key to topic education --- self-restraint is built into the literature. The neg should get to test the necessity of external restrictions."]
[null,null,"Reject the counterplan – object fiat justifies fiating China won’t escalate or Trump’s not racist – voter for education and fairness because they distort aff ground and distract from core literature – disincentivizes research and devolves to core generics – rejecting the arg doesn’t solve because strat skew has already happened\nCannot fiat binding policies – there’s no lit base to answer and it bypasses solvency deficits\nJudge kick bad – destroys 1AR strategic thinking\n","2. Functional limits --- there’s five topic areas, each with tons of affs --- our CP forces the aff to defend restricting authority instead of stopping any random action."]
[{"$nulls":3},"1. No ground loss --- the CP’s subject to the same constraints of fiat as Congress or the Court. If they don’t have statutory/judicial key warrants, that’s their fault."]
[{"$nulls":3},"2. Literature checks --- we need evidence defending our mechanism for self-restraint."]
[{"$nulls":3},"3. Reject the argument, not the team --- no reason introducing the CP made debate impossible."]
[{"$nulls":3},"not oobject fiat-curbing exec authority, not exec taking action"]
[]
[null,null,"Perm do both – solves the link to flex because it keeps Trump at the table","links to nb, question of authority not sanctions-card"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"1AC proves circumvention\nA. Trump doesn’t want to be boxed into sanctions – Russia sanctions\nB. Secretary of Commerce won’t perceive violations as substantial enough to trigger sanctions – that’s Curry\n"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"CP has no legitimacy and gets rolled back – foreign leaders don’t trust future administrations. \nDriesen 91 ","1. The CP solves future administrations – 1NC text says the president, meaning the office of the presidency, NOT Trump specifically. That applies to future presidential actions as well."]
[{"$nulls":3},"We get durable fiat --- \nA. It’s reciprocal --- otherwise every Aff would lose to “future administrations will overturn the law.”\nB. Key to neg ground --- non-durable fiat lets teams write rollback Affs that change the direction of uniqueness and spike out of core Neg positions\n"]
[{"$nulls":3},". Future admins won’t overturn. Empirical analysis proves.\nSharece Thrower, 2017"]
[{"$nulls":3},"This applies to the aff as well – future congresses can rollback the plan."]
[]
[null,null,"Doesn’t solve the advantages\nA – modelling – other countries perceive Trump sanctions as green protectionism and won’t latch on – that’s Huggins\nB – trust – international cooperation is key – that’s Graham\nC – doesn’t solve other treaties like the IWC\n","1. Inter-branch fights turn international signal – incoherence undermines business planning and negotiations – that was the overview. "]
[{"$nulls":3},"2. The executive sends a stronger signal – solvency is offense for us. \nJohn Feffer, 7/14/2018"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Only the president can establish a credible signal."]
[{"$nulls":3},"Domestic audience costs create international credibility"]
[{"$nulls":3},"4. Trump’s foreign policy is not unpredictable. "]
[null,null,"External constraints on Trump are the only way to restore international legitimacy and diplomatic relations – this is aff offense – that’s Yarhi-Milo. "]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Trump volatile unilateralism kills global credibility – tagged as green protectionism.\nFeldstein 18 "]

{"sheet":"Romney DA","index":9,"n_rows":26,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":26}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Romney is persuading GOP to check Trumps nominations now – providing political cover is key",null,null,"More probable – robust statistical support for democratic peace – disease hysteria has been disproven time and time again, see Ebola and Zika","why would romeny get blame for bipart wildlife","turns case, don't have to reinvent wheel","romney won't vote aff"]
[null,1,null,"Turns illegal hunting – lack of democratic norms collapses rule of law – illegal practices become unchecked","popular to restrict in contexts","all of our evidence in the 1nr proves democracy is unqiuely key to solve enviro issues and food things, it also specifically answers the warming add on, internatioanl cooperation is uniquely key to resolve it","bipartisan--100 people voted for it"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Turns pandemics – democracy’s key to being responsive to the people and producing the pharmaceuticals they need – collapse destroys the incentive to provide care – here’s a card\nJustesen 12 ","yemen proves","LINK DEBATE---bipart doesn't matter. Link explantaion in 1nr is fantastic, defere to that, they don't have issue specific uq, default negiatve, romney is opposing trump judicial appointments, the plan tradesoff with this, far back as cx of 1ac, trump does sanction as foreign policy, probably means trump initiates coflcit","no threshold for nominees"]
["Plan collapses his ability to persuade – its too extreme \nGehrke 11/11 ",null,null,"Turns warming – countries with authoritarian bents are less likely to protect the environment – US pulling out of Paris under Trump proves\nLI & REUVENY  06\n","popular vs unpopular restrictions","even if it doesn't sap romney's potential to combat those nomiantions, romeny perceies it to be such, low link threshold, zero risk of the thumpers.","democracy impact fake-capitalist preace"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Turns food wars – lack of democratic accountability makes it impossible to equitably distribute resources – causes scarcity and conflict","epa hearing should thump some check on authroity","impact--trump monimations are new in the 1ar, defer to evidence read in the 1nr, democracy solves conflcits because it facilitates inter country communication and deescalation","not reverse causual on environment"]
["Collapses democracy – unchecked Trump nominees encourage authoritarianism ",null,null,"Rolls back the plan – makes it easier for Trump to circumvent restrictions on his authority and allows agencies like the EPA to continue fucking the environment"]
[{"$nulls":4},"lots of trump nominees now-what's threshold"]
[null,null,"romney no push plan","This wasn’t even an argument – don’t let them make it one later - I’m just gonna re explain the 1nc link. Picking fights (i.e. restrictions) with Trump destroys Romney’s influence and means he doesn’t have the sway to prevent appointment of authoritarian judicial nominees.","dpt is bad conflict thing"]
["Key to global democratic peace – other countries model the U.S. ",null,null,"Balancing criticism is key – plan makes Romney too extreme \nRogers 11/14 ","not causaliaty"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Romney thinks attacks on Trump are zero sum – plan trades off \nRoll Call 18 ","collapse takes a long time"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Romney’s strategy is discrete and effective now – plan flips it\nWashington Examiner 11/14 ","food wars turn it--can't sustain democracy without resources"]
[]
[{"$nulls":4},"trump doesn't care about this authority"]
[null,null,"plan is bipart","This also wasn’t an argument\nNo ev says the plan is bipartisan – Clinton Kasich bill isn’t a restriction\n","polarizaiton not trump is threat to democracy--card"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Not bipartisan – GOP doesn’t want restrictions on Trump\nBipartisanship irrelevant – it’s about Romney checking Trump, which takes away his political clout and influence on judicial nominees\n"]
[{"$nulls":3},"romney perceive lose influence"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"democracy peace is wrong","Their warrant is capitalist peace theory – that’s wrong\nChoi 16 "]
[{"$nulls":3},"Capitalist peace theory is flawed – only democracy solves conflict\nChoi 16 "]
[{"$nulls":3},"Democracy creates deterrence – stops conflict by changing calculations of leaders\nTERRY  07    \n"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Loss of democracy = extinction\nDiamond 95\n"]
[{"$nulls":3},"The impact to absolute power is nuclear war\nForrester 89 "]
[{"$nulls":3},"more democracy mpx"]
[null,null,"trump inev-alt causes"]

{"sheet":"infra ptix","index":10,"n_rows":15,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":15}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Infrastructure passes now---it’s bipartisan. ",null,"Won’t pass – funding. Bottom of the docket.\nMulero 1/31 ","not bipartisan--Congressional involvement in sanctions collapses presidential foreign policy – trigger happy congress ruins deal making and turn all of their trust internal links ","da should have been triggered hundreds of imes?"]
["Includes a gas tax",1,null,"just about environment policy but checks on prez are more unpopular?"]
["Restrictions destroy the bipartisan agenda. "]
["Solves oil dependence, volatility, petro-state influence and warming",null,"fights now/no bipart"]
["Volatility goes nuclear"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Clinton-Kasich initiative thumps and proves it’s bipartisan."]
[]
[]
[null,null,"No partisanship spillover – infrastructure transcends ideology.\nLNP 2/1 "]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Oil wars don’t happen.\nMeierding 16"]

{"sheet":"prez powers","index":11,"n_rows":21,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":21}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Prez powers high – restricting authority won’t happen – but impact turns will be checked",null,null,"Congressional checks spiral – lead to isolationism that undermines US involvement – means tons of nuclear wars that risk extinction.","check pres solves miscalc, restore legitimacy of deterrence"]
[null,1,null,"It’s faster – China’s growing more assertive and will launch a military offensive if they see disunity in foreign policy","trump has hair trigger"]
["Congressional control of sanctions sets a model – collapses diplomatic flexibility \nHufbauer and Jung 17 ",null,null,"It’s more probable:\nA. Literature consensus – most of IR scholarship agrees conveying political resolve is key to military objectives\n","thumpers on ptix--low link thresold, checks now"]
[{"$nulls":3},"B. Perception – signs of presidential weakness compound to cause war\nBolton 09 ","no spillover-sanctions and war powers"]
["Isolationism causes global war\nFelzenberg and Gray 11 ",{"$nulls":3},"presidnet not using power now"]
[{"$nulls":4},"trump signs the bill disproves romney da"]
[]
[null,null,"xxx"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"trump is bad actor","Trump’s being rebuked now – Congress will stop the worst of his policies. BUT, they won’t restrict authority – there’s only a risk of offense for us. That’s Hay."]
[{"$nulls":3},"sanctions to justify foreign policy actions"]
[]
[null,null,"North Korea and Russia sanctions.\nPhillips 8-17-"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Nope – Japan Whaling was based on a fantasy of plenary power. Reversing doesn’t shift precedent.\nDriesen 91 "]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Trump signs – that means the plan doesn’t overturn longstanding practice or provide a new gloss."]

{"sheet":"Macros","index":12,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":18}
["Command","Function "]
["Control+Shift+N","Auto-Numbers"]
[]
["Control + I ","Add Row "]
[]
["control + b","Group Selection "]
[]
["control + shift + b","Undo Group Selection "]
[]
["Control + S ","New Sheet "]
[]
["Control + L ","5 spaces down "]
[]
["Control + K ","5 spaces up"]
[]
["Control + Pageup","Next Sheet to the left"]
[]
["Control + Pagedown ","Next Sheet to the Right "]