{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":12,"sheets":["Inh","Solvency","5g Adv","topicality","CP","Flex DA","IPR","K","court legiitimacy da","2020 da","Off 7","Macros"],"not_rendered":{"macros":1,"defined_names":11},"read":"whole","date_system":"1904"}

{"sheet":"Inh","index":0,"n_rows":1,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":1}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]

{"sheet":"Solvency","index":1,"n_rows":1,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":1}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]

{"sheet":"5g Adv","index":2,"n_rows":8,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":8}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["In Apple v Qualcomm, Judge Pender refused to ban importation of iPhones by using the rare public interest exception – but Section 337 also gives Trump the authority to review that ITC determination",null,"The President of the United States federal government should order a tactical nuclear first strike on military assets of the People’s Republic of China","cp is written wrong-feaver 17","robots are bad-rogue ai, global destruction"]
["Trump has expressed interest in using his disapproval power – he’s been trying to protect Qualcomm",null,"US-China war inevitable---multiple warrants---we can beat them now, but prolonging it closes the edge","it would force a court ruling","China’s planning a first-strike on US cities now"]
["The iPhone ban would be detrimental for 5G development – a competitive network is vital to American prominence",null,"First striking now wipes out China’s offensive capabilities and second-strike – but waiting makes it survivable AND lets them strike first","doesn't answer impacts","US strikes only does attacks military targets and nuclear siloes – BUT, city attacks cause extinction – they’re the only thing that causes nuke winter "]
["Winning the 5G race is crucial to the US lead over Chinese AI development",null,"Strike now is key – otherwise they’ll get robot submarines","we stop cyber attacks","moving isssue"]
["Chinese advantage in AI locks in new military capabilities – guarantees miscalc",null,null,"russia would attack us","something about restriction?"]
["Escalation goes nuclear ",{"$nulls":3},"perms must be net topical"]
["Independently, US 5G is key to prevent Chinese hybrid warfare, expansionism, and cyber-attacks. "]

{"sheet":"topicality","index":3,"n_rows":21,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":21}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Restriction is a prohibition\nNorthglenn 11 ",null,"We meet: We prohibit Presidential authority to levy import restrictions under an entire statute of congressionally delegated trade authority – 337(j) specifically"]
["In means throughout",1]
["THE before a noun means the GROUP AS A WHOLE",null,"C/I – ‘in’ means ‘within’ not throughout "]
["1. Limits – they justify the country of the week, the process of the week and the tariff of the week aff. \n2.   Shapes Predictable Ground – Allowing them to specify allows them to escape key predictable disads like manufacturing or flex and gives them the advantage of narrowing the aff debate.\n"]
[]
[null,null,"“In” modifies where the restriction must be applied – permutation of interpretations accesses their best offense"]
[]
[null,null,"C/I – restrict is to limit, not to prohibit"]
[]
[null,null,"“the” refers to the group but is modified by words after"]
[]
[null,null,"C/I – “the” is only an article that precedes nouns"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Their interpretation is bad for aff ground – there are only 5 affs: 2 impacts\n1. Aff flexibility is key to strategy and fairness – PICs artificially inflate neg ground. Forces the aff to read advantages on all delegated authority which spreads out the 1AC.\n2. Aff specificity is key to topic education – their interp reduce sthe trade authority debate to literal nonsense by causing a race to unpredictable arguments rather than quality arguments.\n"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"solvency"]
[]
[null,null,"competing interp"]

{"sheet":"CP","index":4,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":18}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["The Executive Branch of the United States should:\n--stop rejecting the results of United States International Trade Commission adjudications \n--invest in 5g innovation\n---grant patents to those who show most the promising chance of innovation, decided by an internal review board established by the Department of Commerce\n---invest in infrastructure to deter patent trolls\n",null,"can't give patents","the CP solves the whole case: we have the executive stop rejecting the results of United States International Trade Commission adjudications--uq for adv 1"]
[null,1]
[{"$nulls":3},"kick the plank grant patents"]
[null,null,"investment doesn't matter"]
[{"$nulls":3},"review board sufficient to solve patent trolls"]
[null,null,"links to qualcomm"]
[{"$nulls":3},"they din't read cards"]
[]
[{"$nulls":3},"perm links to net benefit"]
[null,null,"The counterplan is illegitimate – behavioral fiat is a voting issue for fairness and education:\na. Debatability – their model allows them to fiat out of all solvency deficits – destroys aff strategy\nb. Ground – they can get infinite planks without solvency advocates and no aff reciprocity which artificially expands neg ground\nOur interpretation is that policy debates are over written policy proposals such as legislation and executive orders, not behavior of specific political actors.\n","we give moneey to legitimat patents"]
[{"$nulls":3},"we aren't behavioal"]
[{"$nulls":3},"legal structures"]
[null,null,"Counterplan is uncertain – don’t  know whos on review board","esr heart of topic"]
[{"$nulls":3},"easily debateable"]
[{"$nulls":3},"new aff"]
[]
[{"$nulls":3},"not uncertain--dept of commerce"]

{"sheet":"Flex DA","index":5,"n_rows":43,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":43}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Trump’s realist internationalism maintains previous foreign policy and restores leadership against revisionist powers",null,null,"flex solves shit-list"]
["plan demolishes flex-tucker 18",null,null,"Trump’s executive power is perceived as strong now—it’s deterring Russia, Iran, and Syria from starting wars"]
["War powers key to deter chemical weapon use",null,null,"Iran aggression goes nuclear\nVotel 18 "]
["Failure to uphold the taboo causes extinction\nShamai 18 ",null,null,"They force Trump’s hand—his strategic ambiguity deters irregular warfare—failures go nuclear, we’re an impct filter not the other way around"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Kinetic wars go nuclear and outweigh on magnitude—they’re the only scenario for escalation "]
[null,null,"No link – the affirmative doesn’t rule on nondelegation – we fiat otherwise. Our solvency evidence even makes a distinction – proves courts would recognize it","The plan will get wrapped up in legal battles over foreign affairs power\nHufbauer 17\n"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Strategic ambiguity deters CBW use – war powers not key"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"no extinction from bioterror--5 reasons"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"impact is vague something"]
[]
[null,null,"Strike now is key---China will militarily be equal to us in 2020---prefer new studies"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"5G is not zero-sum\nFinley 18\n"]
[]
[null,null,"It's too late for the US to catch up to China in 5G\nDano 8-7\n"]
[]
[null,null,"It’s legal and even if it isn’t they’ll presume it is! [wake=blue]\nFeaver 17 "]
[]
[]
[null,null,"try or die flisp neg"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"No war from cyber-attacks---the point is to avoid armed conflict with low level manipulation and coercion"]
[null,null,"recency something military pla plan"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"trump something osmethign"]
[null,null,"china domination something something"]
[null,null,"economic globalization"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"status competion--heath 18"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"naval powr impact crospey 18"]

{"sheet":"IPR","index":6,"n_rows":15,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":15}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Oil States ruled that patents are a public right, but left Due Process under Eldridge as ground for constitutional challenges of inter partes reviews – that’ll make IPRs unconstitutional",{"$nulls":3},"No extinction from diseases \nFarquhar et al. 17 "]
["Ruling IPR unconstitutional will re-invigorate patent trolls\nRizzolo 18 ",1,null,null,"No disease impact---empirics, conditioning, coevolution, and science\nEasterbrook 18"]
["Patent trolls will target green energy and wreck innovation – prevents it from becoming cost competitive\nStanford, 12 ",{"$nulls":3},"No extinction from warming---our evidence assumes the worst-case scenario\nSandberg 18"]
["Transition to a sustainable energy economy is key to solve extinction – technology is key\nRifkin, 2014",null,"All their impact scenarios are backwards and rely on faulty science—CO2 must keep increasing to avoid extinction—impact are ag, bio-d loss, and ice age","Even their science says an Ice Age is 50,000 years off – our impacts happen well before","Natural cycles trump anthropocentric warming \nKumar 17 "]
["An administrative due process rooted in the Petition Clause abandons the utilitarian focus of Eldridge and alters the courts’ role in reviewing administrative due process",null,"Patent trolls exist now---their ev is from 2013 shouldve thumped","Regardless, those studies are bunk – prefer actual science "]
["VC investment and small company acquisitions are key to biotech innovations – numerous studies confirm",null,"pharma sucks at innovation","ocean acidification","Not going for ice age but sucks they didn’t answer c02 ag: it’s key, ez extinction scenario because we all starve and start resource wars, increases global anxieties and businesses restrict themselves: 2008 food crisis proves, no new 1ar answers bc the block is predicated on 2ac mistakes"]
["Patent trolls reduce innovation and deter venture capital",null,"Pharma productivity is low now—high prices are killing sales\nDobbs 16\n","destroys food-sticklen 2k15","CO2 increases plant growth – peer reviewed studies prove – increases photosynthesis, water efficiency, adaptability to drought, and decreases toxic gasses "]
["That innovation is key to prevent extinction – new microbial threats constantly emerge",null,null,"high prices last forever","Historical and modelling data prove carbon fertilization outweighs warming "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Loss of arable land means Co2 fertilization is the only way to increase food production fast enough to solve for coming resource shortages- short timeframe for food crisis instability- our impacts turns theirs\nCarter et.al ‘11"]
[{"$nulls":4},"The effects if acidification are way overstated – no impact for centuries, adaptation solves, alt causes, increased CO2 solves "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Salt solves—saltwater provides buffer and Revelle factor checks CO2\nMoore 15 "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Warming only has positive effects on the ocean—no risk of their offense\nMoore 15 "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Don’t trust them – claims are biased \nMartin 16 "]
[{"$nulls":4},"no warming impact singer 16"]

{"sheet":"K","index":7,"n_rows":23,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":23}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Formalistic checks on executive power enable structural violence to persist—the alternative is grassroots organizing—vote neg",null,"Framework—they have the burden of rejoinder—the K must prove the fiated implications of the plan are worse than the consequences of a neg ballot.  "]
[null,1]
[]
[null,null,"Moving away from aff-focus monopolizes prep for the neg which undermines content retention, deters in-depth research, and precludes strategic intricacy.  "]
[]
[]
[null,null,"The impact is fairness—their framework shifts away from the controversy that we’re equally prepared to debate about—that decks clash, which is the only metric the judge can use to fairly determine the winner."]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Debating policy’s key – pure critique is insufficient and causes right fill-in\nKubota and Miller, 17"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"their impact is bad"]
[null,null,"talking about aff good"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"circumvention is wrong"]
[null,null,"Crocker and Hodges"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"perf con"]
[null,null,"debate itself"]

{"sheet":"court legiitimacy da","index":8,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Trump’s court-bashing tanks legitimacy, but the plan allows Roberts to reassert himself and shore up legitimacy—the plan is the only case that triggers the link"]
[null,1,"There’s no uniqueness – \n1. National emergency case thumps – it’ll be relevant and definitely influences Roberts’ rationale\n2. Feldman says that Roberts’ rulings on executive authority are inevitable\n"]
["Extra capital gives Roberts the ability to strike down gun control\nRuger 18\n"]
[null,null,"Attacks on courts and executive constraints are inevitable"]
["Stronger Second Amendment increases cartel violence\nVargas and Gonzalez 15\n"]
[null,null,"NO link – the plan doesn’t shore up legitimacy"]
["Cartel violence causes hotspot escalation—turns everything\nHaddick 10\n"]
[null,null,"Turn – if the plan draws fire from trump, it means that legitimacy is still at risk"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"TURN – strong second amendment causes greater flows into South America because excess supply here"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Cartels are devastated and they don’t cause wide-reaching instability \nKRGV 16 "]
[]
[]
[null,null,"no modeling of us courts"]
[null,null,"doesn't solve other countries"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"roberts is not a swing vote"]

{"sheet":"2020 da","index":9,"n_rows":14,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":14}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Dems win ---restrictions turn political blame against Democrats – costs them 2020",null,"Trump wins now – \na. Incumbency and the map\n"]
["Trump re-election locks-in devastating foreign policy that implodes the liberal order.",1]
["Great power war."]
[null,null,"b. electoral realities mean demographics matter, not policy"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Courts are above political blowback – Trump appointments \nMazzone 18 "]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Dem overreach narrative is already baked in – emergency powers and Yemen thump"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"disease impact outweighs"]

{"sheet":"Off 7","index":10,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":3}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
[]
[null,1]

{"sheet":"Macros","index":11,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":18}
["Command","Function "]
["Control+Shift+N","Auto-Numbers"]
[]
["Control + I ","Add Row "]
[]
["control + b","Group Selection "]
[]
["control + shift + b","Undo Group Selection "]
[]
["Control + S ","New Sheet "]
[]
["Control + L ","5 spaces down "]
[]
["Control + K ","5 spaces up"]
[]
["Control + Pageup","Next Sheet to the left"]
[]
["Control + Pagedown ","Next Sheet to the Right "]