{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":12,"sheets":["Inh","Adv 2","Adv 3","Solvency","CASE","CP","biometric cp","Terror DA","FW","Off 5","Off 6","Macros"],"not_rendered":{"macros":1,"defined_names":11},"read":"whole","date_system":"1904"}

{"sheet":"Inh","index":0,"n_rows":1,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":1}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]

{"sheet":"Adv 2","index":1,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":3}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
[]
[null,1]

{"sheet":"Adv 3","index":2,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":3}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
[]
[null,1]

{"sheet":"Solvency","index":3,"n_rows":1,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":1}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]

{"sheet":"CASE","index":4,"n_rows":32,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":32}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Bulk surveillance authority is a disciplinary assemblage of social and political technologies that functions as the normative social order’s bulwark against insecure, undefined possibilities. Through this apparatus, non-heteronormative bodies are rendered visible, coded by threat assessment as “deviant,” and subsequently targeted.",null,"Material political change is possible and good – totalizing theories of powere re-inforce heteronormativity. ","surveillance is risk assesment, socail policing, subjectivt that must be known"]
["Because a subject must be identified to be governed, identity itself must be enforced through a dispersed Panoptic. As individuals are coerced into discursive self-signification, the queer-rhizomatic is policed into fixed, predictable subjectivities.",null,null,"overkill-queer body to bodyy destine to death"]
["Queer Bodies are always in state of overkill inside liberal democracy – the legal theories not only justify but support pushing the queer into the constant zone of death that designates a non-temporality to exist for the queer body ",null,null,"reactionary? Turns ta's logica of optiimisi is bad because violence accumulates"]
["Policy reform has become trapped in cycles of reactive support and re-endangerment that parasitize queer catastrophe, exploiting concepts like “equality” that justify additional surveillance and militarization of non-heteronormative identities. ",null,"Queerness isn’t ontologically negative—small reforms have and can help larger shifts","divestment of knowledge prodction that creates socail policing"]
["The social order defines and legitimates itself through value dualisms such as human/inhuman, normative/deviant, and self/other, imposed via strategies of naming and consumptive inclusion. The intelligible queer is thereby understood as antinomy, a deviant ontological impossibility marked by the state for destruction. Thus, we affirm queerness as a fundamental negation of social order and futurity. We must become no one.",null,null,"their cards are about puar homonationalism"]
["Our mode of queer un-becoming is not a moralized, eschatological finale, but embodied, non-teleological affirmation of imminent possibilities. This lived-apokálypsis destabilizes cruelly optimistic moral dimensions like scenario-planning, which seek to secure and master futurity by way of limiting incoherence and impossibility.",null,null,"we are talking about progresisve masking?"]
["Violence accumulates in the present and extend to the future – every chance failed at challenging the system means one more queer person dead on the streets – The State works through formulations of self-policing that works through things like “safety from extinction” which extends as an unattainable eschatological ideal where queer people are seen as a danger to future populations ",null,"Vote negative on presumption – reading the 1AC doesn’t change the conditions of the status quo – you can vote negative while agreeing with its content, but there’s no warrant for the ballot. If the 2AC says it’s just a question of winning the flow, it proves the impact to fairness – ","optimism is a false choice--assimilatiton--self hate"]
["The law cannot be neutral in its grounding towards anti-queer violence perpetuated by the state. It cannot give out the violence and also decide whether the violence has been remedied the state, anti-state action is the only mechanism for solvency",null,"First – insularity – the forced winner/loser nature of debate means minds don’t change because the 1NC always has to say the 1AC was wrong. ","preeumption ballot-victim blaming, rupture episteomology sometihgin"]
[null,null,"Second – competitive incentives – create a race to reworking the 1AC until all ground becomes non-existent – you should err negative because they’re structurally tilted towards minimizing clash.  ","better epistemoglocial model"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Queer anti-futurity dooms climate movements—the impact is extinction and global inequality. Hall 2k14","Attempts to resolve climate change empirically fail and consolidate liberal humanism through economics, risk management, sustainability, and survivalism.   Colebrook 14"]
[]
[{"$nulls":3},"we don't read deleudze, undoing of identity"]
[null,null,"The United States federal government should repurpose all surveillance technologies, including biometrics, to provide an unconditional basic income guarantee without means testing and to track racialized health disparities.\n\nSurveillance information should be used to provide everyone an unconditional basic income guarantee without means testing and health services based on racial disparities.\n\nNo perms. We’re impact turning the 1AC’s refusal of state surveillance. The 1AC never said which parts of surveillance were okay, so if the CP isn’t mutually exclusive, it proves being neg against this aff is an unmanageable burden because we can’t predict what ground is viable—and, perms prove the 1AC doesn’t eschew all state action, so the burden for us winning a topical version is extremely low—but, if they don’t make a perm, it doesn’t prove we have sufficient ground because they still get an unfair advantage from defending an extra-topical method.\n"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"The counterplan captures biopolitical surveillance technologies for life-saving social services---willingness to be open to benefits of surveillance is vital for new futures that remedy inequality\nFerguson 15 "]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Independently, the collection of racial health data is essential to alleviating disparities—health gaps are not ontological, they’re a consequence of neoliberal anti-welfare policies—rejecting data collection replicates color-neutral denial "]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Pessimism demobilizes queer resistance and erases agency of those struggling for material change. "]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Material queer politics are good and don’t legitimize the state."]
[]
[]
[null,null,"theory of becoming is wrong-something about constraints is good"]

{"sheet":"CP","index":5,"n_rows":28,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":28}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["The United States federal government should substantially increase its judicial restrictions on the bulk incidental collection of foreign intelligence information on United States persons without a warrant via an application of the Third Amendment. ",null,"condo-moving target, not reciprocal"]
[null,1]
["that protects cmr"]
[null,null,"they have ways to test shit?"]
[]
["And foreign miscalculation. "]
[null,null,"they have ground"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"their impacts are eschalogical?"]
[null,null,"extinction bad?"]
[]
[null,null,"systerms of power reentrench themselves through procedural stff?"]
[null,null,"meta power exists with in state--something about risk"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"xxxx"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"perm do both"]
[]
[null,null,"they don't solve for surveillance of queer people"]
[]
[null,null,"don't solve anti-queerness"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"queer people are otherized so can't use the courts"]

{"sheet":"biometric cp","index":6,"n_rows":14,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":14}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
[null,null,"pdb"]
[null,1]
[]
[null,null,"surveil poor people for money sucks"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"cruel optimism"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"we read blue"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"forced identification is bad"]

{"sheet":"Terror DA","index":7,"n_rows":14,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":14}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["The aff shreds counter-terror. ",null,"no link--we don't get rid of legal mechanisms"]
["It causes nuclear war.  Hayes 18",1]
[]
[null,null,"surveillance is inevitable?"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"nuke terorr risk low--zack 16"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"no groups"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"anti queer violence--queer people will get called terrorist"]

{"sheet":"FW","index":8,"n_rows":53,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":53}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["The affirmative should defend the hypothetical enactment of the resolution. "]
["resolved"]
["usfg"]
["sumer 94"]
["“Statutory” and “judicial restrictions” on executive authority are imposed by the government on the government."]
[]
[]
["First – limits – the resolution defines pre-round prep and research – alternate burdens create incentives for avoidance because 1AC’s strategically minimize clash – other limits are illogical and artificially pick-and-choose literature which will always favor the affirmative.  "]
[null,null,"we meet--queer becoming to restrict exec power"]
["Second – ground – they skirt both the actor and the mechanism – forces a run to shallow generics and creates marginal engagement at best – any 2AC ground will rely on conceding solvency for links and ignores our ability to predict offense."]
[]
[null,null,"more ground--proves 1nc"]
["the impact is clash and fairnes poscher 16"]
[]
[null,null,"epistmeolgical model that appraoches the world to restrict surveillance"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"planless affs are inevitable"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"unifiy practice"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"debate is about education so care about knowledge prodction"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"always a prodcuedral question? You could play chess? Debate education has to matter, portable skills?"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"liberal democracy is bad--can't access same education"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"state is irreedeemeable--can't advocate for death"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"way have more resources"]
[null,null,"people break new affs all the time"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"fw is policing"]
[]
[null,null,"limits--don't specifc something?"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"cruel optiims--state action"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"progresss sucks--integration into state"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"risk assessment"]

{"sheet":"Off 5","index":9,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":3}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
[]
[null,1]

{"sheet":"Off 6","index":10,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":3}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
[]
[null,1]

{"sheet":"Macros","index":11,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":18}
["Command","Function "]
["Control+Shift+N","Auto-Numbers"]
[]
["Control + I ","Add Row "]
[]
["control + b","Group Selection "]
[]
["control + shift + b","Undo Group Selection "]
[]
["Control + S ","New Sheet "]
[]
["Control + L ","5 spaces down "]
[]
["Control + K ","5 spaces up"]
[]
["Control + Pageup","Next Sheet to the left"]
[]
["Control + Pagedown ","Next Sheet to the Right "]