{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":12,"sheets":["Inh","Adv 3","T","Refugees","India","lower courts cp","concon cp","gerrymander da","Adv CP","Stare decisis DA","chevron da","Macros"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":10,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1904"}

{"sheet":"Inh","index":0,"n_rows":1,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":1,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]

{"sheet":"Adv 3","index":1,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
[]
[null,1]

{"sheet":"T","index":2,"n_rows":13,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":13,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Nearly all means 100% minus one or two exceptions",null,"1. We meet prohibition – The plan explicitly has Congressionally Implemented human rights treaties and their rulings AUTOMATICALLY supercede agency deference in all areas of conflict – this is the 1ac Sweeney evidence- "]
["Limits – there hundreds of regulatory agencies and thousands more acts that agencies are granted deference to – that explodes the research burden. ",1,"2 – CI – Affirmatives must apply a Judicial Litmus Test superseding executive deference in nearly all instances "]
["Ground – core negative ground relies upon wholesale changes to the all deference regimes, not minor fixes to small areas.",null,"In means must apply the test to the group as a whole"]
[null,null,"Restriction means to put a compulsion on to create a litmus test"]
[null,null,"3. We meet and reflects deference literature - Pre-Chevron testing is more limiting than Chevron – Beth Israel case proves – plan is pre-Chevron testing"]
[null,null,"4. Our interp produces an effective limit – we require the application of the test in nearly all instances – They justify various partial deference regimes – "]
[null,null,"5. Overlimit - they interpret Prohibit as a BAN in ALL INSTANCES – this means they only allow 5 affs."]
[null,null,"6. Mixing Burdens is bad – Our interp merely asks did you place a litmus test – their asks does the litmus test work – this creates judge subjectivity and misunderstands how LEGAL TESTING works."]
[null,null,"7. Focus on Judicial standards is educationally valuable – Charming Betsy, Hard look Review, and Non-discrimination tests are three examples - Sophisticated debate is better:"]
[null,null,"8. Functional limits check --- advantage CPs, flex, Ks and politics check abuse – "]
[null,null,"pics"]
[null,null,"reasonabiltiy"]

{"sheet":"Refugees","index":3,"n_rows":14,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":14,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["The Refugee Crisis magnifies the risk for Middle East instability---system compliance in resettlement efforts reduces it",null,"no turkey prolif-2k15","instability in turkey now","turkey doesn't like refugees-nationalism and economics","yes burden sharing-sweeny-uq incentive, other execs"]
["Turkish instability causes them to prolif—escalating arms races cause Iran-Turkey nuclear war and regional conflict",null,null,"rational response","no prolif-no incentive, tech barriers, 2022, strategic reasons to not to, safeguardas and iaea huge change","iran and something about migrants"]
["Compliance with IHRL is key to solve the root and proximate causes of the forced migration crisis—otherwise failed states increase globally",null,"Escalation is empirically denied – it’s been unstable for decades","unique scenario","no nuke terorr- no 9/11, states won't supply one, us counter meeasures","draws in middle east"]
["Failed states increase risk of miscalc – great power war\nBailey 17 ",null,null,null,"won't use nuke weapons, doesn't escalate--cards","forc turkey hand"]
["Numerous states on the brink - failed states results in attacks on US and Europe and WMD terror",null,null,null,null,"yes terror-rurrisa or somewhere else"]
["Nuke terror causes global nuclear war",null,null,null,"No middle east war---mutual checkmating prevents the impact---states have deterrence and interdependence incentives that the aff can’t overcome, and Great powers don’t have an incentive to intervene. ","they decrease failed states"]
["Even if it’s just large-scale conventional, US lashes out with nukes – fear of terror means no checks",null,"Middle east war doesn’t escalate – great powers won’t get involved",null,null,"nocheck on trump"]
["Refugee crisis magnifies risk of every war – The key internal link is HONORING REFUGEE RIGHTS, not just letting them in!",null,null,null,"No impact to failed states – data---mazarr says there is no connection between US stability and states. ","turkey and iran escalatie conflcit"]
["Executive Control causes a more restrictive refugee policy globally",null,"No impact to failed states – data\nMazarr 14 ","draw in + inter borader conflcit","just read ag eneric card about escalation"]
["It is about the structure of non-refoulment---it requires an executive check, anything else undermines the Refugee Convention ",null,null,"yes motive and means, steal niversity?","a bunch of impact cards but no tied to internal link or how I law solves them"]
["Only a judicial check on the executive that recognizes international law on par with the Constitution of Refugee interpretation can send a strong signal of US support for refugee rights",null,"no impact to terrorism","lashout, trump"]
["2 – Inconsistent US lower court rulings---UNHCR refugee standards are not equally applied---this undermines harmonization necessary for the global refugee regime to work---plan reverses through Supreme Court action---key to global signal "]
["And no Court DA’s---this case would be distinguished due to Treaty Obligations "]

{"sheet":"India","index":4,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":17,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["1AC",null,"1NC","2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["India’s Supreme Court has the spirit to uphold refugee rights, but by deferring to the executive they are inconsistent in refugee protection",null,null,"India models the US’s scotus to a tee with routine reviews to ensure they model our changes, specifically for human rights: this is key because they have the spirit to uphold refugee rights, but aren’t because of deference to the executive which could send tens of thousands of Rohingya muslims back to Myanmar: those who challenge the genocide radicalize which boosts instability. Terrorist instability and religious conflicts will both independently go nuclear do to perceived moral obligation to win.india models scotus"]
["Their court needs to prevent further deportations of Rohingyas to solve the refugee crisis",1]
["US judiciary actions on refugee law is modeled by Indian Supreme Court and others in Asia and Africa---status quo sends strong signal that international human rights law is not binding",null,null,null,null,"overview"]
["Failure to protect the Rohingya sparks terrorist recruitment, Buddhist extremism, and Southeast Asian instability--- protecting non-refoulment is critical",null,"no judicla model","doesn't say india",null,"comparative resvse causual cards"]
["Southeast Asian instability goes nuclear---terrorism is the main trigger",null,null,"our ev is an indian judge","Countries view the US legal system as outdated, there are better models, and most countries that want to model have already done it","their shit is old"]
["The nationalist Buddhist threat is real---they have the means and motives to generate intra and interstate conflict throughout the region",null,"Their modelling ev is also citing British law – alt cause to the Aff if because they’re strict on refugees","ihrl modelled by indiia","selectively","india card is about two random treaties"]
["South Asian religious conflict goes nuclear",null,null,null,"Modelling won’t influence fundamental political forces in other countries","india is moeled in region"]
[null,null,"No Southeast Asia conflict bisley 14","dropped religious war"]
[]
[null,null,"india is not a party to ilaw","india cares","They misunderstand how international law works – supreme courts abide by international law when they decide there’s a general principle, or principle in conventions/treaties etc that binds them to law – this means the US is only one country that affects foreign precedence and not enough to swing a court case because they don’t weigh more than other countries in judicial court cases "]
[null,null,null,"spirit "]
[null,null,null,null,"india not a party to refugee treaties"]
[null,null,null,null,"their card says that-green highlighting"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"No Southeast asia war---interdependence and deterrence check it"]

{"sheet":"lower courts cp","index":5,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["The United States federal government should have the lower federal courts follow a doctrine that restricts in at least nearly all instances federal administrative agency interpretation and regulation that violate a pre-Chevron test requiring Congressionally implemented human rights instruments and their interpretive bodies to supersede Executive deference.",null,"Perm do the CP- plan text says federal judiciary that includes the lower courts- aff gets to define what the plan means, the alternative are infinitely regressive negative CP’s that always steal the aff and prevent clash"]
[null,1]
[]
["scotus follow on",null,"pdb"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"circuit courts don't publish their opinions-modeling"]
[]
[null,null,null,"courts wouuld model africa "]
[null,null,"scotus key to modeling"]
[null,null,"African instability escalates and draws in great powers"]

{"sheet":"concon cp","index":6,"n_rows":49,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":49,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
[null,null,null,"100%, no ofense on courts","the thesis of non-refoulement is that executive control undermines treaty obligations to the UNHCR and NO ONE believes or like it---and the separation of powers rationale in chevron and asylum and withholding applications etc are being abused by an empowered executive - the only way to comply with the human rights framework is ending deference to precedent---we have the only actor not invested in deterring immigration – the resettlement stuff isn’t perceived because it’s the exec ","no solevncy deficit","timeframe--concon takes 5 years"]
[null,1,null,"not tied to impact",null,"warming outweighs","increase of terrorism and failed states"]
[null,null,null,"complying with treaty and norms",null,"turns mpx-threat mulitplier-terror and resource shortage, failed states","bigger than warming on magnitude"]
[null,null,null,"modeling only requires compliance",null,"cant negotiate with enviro","nclear winter turns warming"]
[null,null,null,"putting it in constiutiton is modelled",null,"strike impact defense from flow","nuclear material from univerisy"]
[null,null,null,"sufficiency",null,"CP PROPOER","cases since 2015"]
[null,null,null,"Only constitutional changes solve – congressional action can be vetoed or circumvented without punishment ",null,"we end deference, plan in constittion","concon takes 5 years"]
[null,null,null,"The courts would be forced to do it – because they adjudicate based on the constitution – that solves the aff ",null,"stronger exerter of human rights","try or die claim aff"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"THEORY DEBATE","turkey prolif something"]
[null,null,null,"Need a con con to check the presidential administrative state\nJurist 14 ",null,"interp--cp must use legal mechanism to change law-that's 6","PERM"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"we have specific evidence","shield the link do both--net benefit rally support"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"topic education-cocon being pushed now","won't look like an activist ruling"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"equitable ground--cut more cards","we redefine should"]
[null,null,null,"court would follow on",null,"lesik--lots of news on it","consult or deliberate"]
[null,null,"Time Delay – Conventions take years so you don’t solve our advantages—they o/w","republican congress",null,"aff innovation--mechanims offense and comparisons","no severance"]
[null,null,null,"fiat immediate, should summer 94",null,"evidence in the context of deference","should vs shall--doesn't do immediately, call for action"]
[null,null,null,"no short time frame impact",null,"they are calling for concon"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"that proves fair and lit","THEORY"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"topic education otuweighs multy actor firat","it sucks--multiactor, fiat away too mch"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"reciprocal with aff","2ac can't read add-on's not in the lit"]
[null,null,"The Court will interpret the CP too narrowly to solve – only a change in Court doctrine works","links more--amendment they have to follow",null,"real world, opp cost","prospect but not advocate"]
[null,null,null,"nearly all cases opens door to circumventon",null,"no impact, better internal link to TE","not good for debate"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"better il to fairness-neg ground","no il to te"]
[null,null,"Perm do both—solves the link\nDenning 2 ","severance?",null,"read add ons about jdicaiary","no clash or education shallow concon debates"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"permutation is sevarance--immediaicy","predictable offense is key to learning"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"links to da-court ruling","concon isn't about the topic"]
[null,null,"Permute – Do the world of the counterplan where the plan is passed, if the plan is not passed – the permutation goes away","word salad",null,"fairness links to their offense","we don't have reciprocal fiat"]
[null,null,null,"doing plan links to da",null,"no impacts based on timeframe","no single actor "]
[null,null,null,null,null,"they don't have solvency evidence","concon debates are stupid"]
[null,null,"1. Multi Actor – they fiat bicameral supermajorities PLUS overwhelming state uniformity; these excesses are used to claim better solvency and to fiat net benefits to which the Aff has no reciprocal fiat power","1. Counterplans must use a legal mechanism to change law – there are only 6 which solves predictable limits ","a). Multi Actor – they fiat bicameral supermajorities PLUS overwhelming state uniformity; this was evident in the 1nc cx that the congress couldn’t do other amendments and they wouldn’t name what states – that’s how they get their solvency claims and they just fiat away answers or get their artificial net benefit which jacks aff strategy because we don’t have recipricola fiat. That proves there’s no Opportunity Cost – no single actor chooses  between the plan and CP; the CP doesn’t inform decisions about whether a person in a position to do the plan should…it sidesteps the only coherent rationale for Neg fiat which decks education – do you want to be watching concon debates jesus Christ. Destroys Fairness – steals aff ground by absorbing the action of the plan and preventing 2AC add-ons – that outweighs because it’s a prior question to clash and education. And In-depth clash – evacuates debate by shifting from product to process and eroding substantive controversy, which prevents nuanced comparison and critical thinking. ","we have evidence in context of deference","product vs process?"]
[null,null,"2. Opportunity Cost – no actor is in a position to choose between the plan and CP; the CP doesn’t inform decisions about whether a person in a position to do the plan should…it sidesteps the only coherent rationale for Neg fiat","2. Topic education – con-con advocates are pushing for restrictions on federal power & checks and balances ","“Resolved” means to deliberate","Africa stuff-cp solves modeling","take too long to solve"]
[null,null,null,"3. Political education – con-con is a useful thought experiment \nLevinson and Moyer 07 ","should only means desirability not binding obligation ","can't quantiy solvency advocates"]
[null,null,null,"4. Equitable ground – conceded 1nc Elving evidence that there are both calls and critiques from both the left and right","not all judges something","reciprocal with aff-they don't have one card"]
[null,null,null,"5. Real world – more common than the elections DA – no one would reject that on theory\nLessig 14 ","no solvency advocate-describes interivew"]
[null,null,null,"Tons of literature – every major news site has published an answer in the past two years \nRiestenberg 18 ","no one calls for it"]
[null,null,null,"7. Aff innovation – different legal regimes encourage actor and process advantages","doesn't solve education-not federal power"]
[null,null,null,"Cost-benefit analysis – con-con is an alternative to Congress \nLessig 14 ","just npr interview"]
[null,null,null,"Predictable – con-con debate is thriving post Trump as a mechanism to constrain the president\nDinan 17 ","gut check, might be possible"]
[null,null,null,"10. Recency and evidence should frame theory – con-con is no longer utopian \nCBS News 17 ","12 states on board"]
[null,null,null,"Theory is a reason to reject illegitimate parts of the CP – if they win that fiating the outcome of the convention, calling a limited convention, or any other plank is illegitimate, kick that and stick us with what you conclude is theoretically legitimate. They have no theory offense versus states passing legislation that they would like a convention which is a sufficient signal to solve the entire case","take forever-duggin 5"]
[null,null,null,"Empirics – con-con to limit eliminate agencies has been suggested\nLeber 15 ","get new arguments"]
[null,null,null,"Comparatively more realistic – con-con is more likely than congressional action on the administrative state\nWoods 17 ","perm do both shields link--enforcmeent would rally support"]
[null,null,null,null,"not severance-definitions above"]
[null,null,"Perm pass our plan after the convention takes place, but before the amendment is passed - avoids politics they introduce an element of time not present in the plan.","severance","links to politics-takes longer then tenure"]
[null,null,null,null,"reject the immediacy planks?"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,"not realistic--their cards say unlike"]
[null,null,null,null,"y"]

{"sheet":"gerrymander da","index":7,"n_rows":43,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":43,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Courts will limit partisan gerrymandering---BUT it requires Robert to balance decisions.",null,null,"Paris withdrawal causes extinction---it locks in existential climate change---now is the key time to create momentum for future efforts and US reductions are key---that’s Schlanger.","refugees cause warming?","turf battles cuase balancing","gorsuch is liberal vote"]
["The plan forces the Court to get involved in turf battles---flips the gerrymandering decision. ",1,null,"Turns advantage 1 – climate change causes resource shortages and mass migration flows – turns Turkey prolif because the internal link is ME migration, turns failed states due to lack of resource access, diversionary  pressures, econ and infrastructure decline","Adaptation solves all the reasons it’s bad","retlation life line of court","it is about immigration"]
["And, gerrymandering guarantees Trump re-election. ",null,null,"Turns advantage 2 – exacerbates resource shortages that worsen the impact to refugee crises – ",null,"always controversial-other branches breaks broad defensce","roberts doesn't do the plan"]
["That causes Paris withdrawal---extinction. ",null,null,"torres 16",null,"backing offi n future","gerrymander doesn't effect presidential elections"]
[null,null,null,null,"roberts won't let them handle diffenretly","roberts cares about legitimacy","it effects mideterms"]
[null,null,null,null,"won't think controversial","he is a swing vote","we turn da-nuclear winter"]
[null,null,null,null,"won't shift-pc is fake, no complet eflip lfop","true under trump--roberts is sensitive","warming inev-positive feedback loops"]
[null,null,null,null,"other shit on da thumps it","threshod for legitimacy is low"]
[null,null,"Their uniqueness card doesn’t say the Court will rule a certain way- no coherent story","SCOTUS will limit partisan gerrymandering – evidence cites LEGAL redistricting experts – says the justices picked the 2 most egregious cases on purpose – and are tired of constantly having cases on the docket – which means they’ll make the politically tough vote.  ","they overrid 6 courts","shadow thing is thmpers, docket is not controversial, causes roberts to flip"]
[null,null,null,"AND – framing issues – Roberts will vote yes because he wants to avoid the politicization of the court.  ","Shadow docket is messy and polarized—your internal link is that the court is quiet on social issues but they’ve since ruled on trans military ban, anti-abortion laws, and religious liberty in executions","this stuff is about past decisions and robert wasn't swing ote"]
[null,null,null,"SCOTUS will act – leading scholar","Roberts doesn’t feel political pressure or care about PC \nHamm 18\n","doesn't say chevron will get change"]
[null,null,null,null,"Sessions v. Dimaya proves that Gorsuch votes in the “liberal” bloc of immigration ","gerry mander key to presidential election--nebraska maine system"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"6% and still win the election"]
[null,null,null,null,"gerrymander effects state districts, not federal election nshit"]
[]
[null,null,"No link- the aff has the courts tell congress to clarify ambiguity which doesn’t drain capital","The plan crushes court capital---it ignites a turf battle between the branches before the issue is ripe---that’s Westerfield. "]
[null,null,null,"Restricting authority saps Robert’s capital---that causes the Court to give concessions to the other branches in different cases. "]
[null,null,null,"Judicial review of separation of powers disputes dissipates limited institutional capital"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Capital is irrelevant to the Supreme Court—personal preferences decide cases and Roberts won’t restrain himself","They said capital is irrelevant – I’ll do the capital debate below, but this ev is from 2013 and is about Citizens United – doesn’t assume the current composition of the court or the docket"]
[null,null,null,"1. Balancing is true---their ev doesn’t assume interbranch conflicts---the plan forces an unexpected controversy---Roberts will back off by giving other branches a win---that’s Young. Especially true in Helsinn---the pivotal question is deference to Congressional statute---that’s Lewers."]
[null,null,null,"2. Even if balancing isn’t true, they dropped the capital link---Roberts needs to use PC to build a coalition---he’s split with Breyer on anti-trust law---that’s Lewers."]
[null,null,null,"Roberts is the swing vote Barnes 18"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"deference case now and kavanuah thups","Gundy will not flip delegation---the court will rule in favor of the government. "]
[null,null,null,"Kavanaugh proves balancing"]
[]
[null,null,"Capital is bulletproof\nGibson 12 ","Roberts doesn’t believe legitimacy is resilient, so he’ll balance"]
[null,null,null,"And, support is not infinite---the plan is the straw that breaks the camel’s back. "]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Doesn’t solve the internal: the SCOTUS case isn’t tailored to state issues","They said the case doesn’t solve gerrymandering – their ev says nothing, just that states need to redistrict – the question of the case is whether they HAVE to"]
[null,null,null,"Gerrymandering is key to 2020---people don’t change their votes ONLY if their vote counts is what matters---Trump will be re-elected EVEN IF he loses the popular vote by six points---our ev cites a statistical model---that’s McCann."]
[null,null,null,"SCOTUS ruling key – could see 2020 gerrymandering copycats"]
[null,null,null,"trump wins now- but no gerrymander flps it"]
[]
[null,null,"Trump will re-enter paris- multiple reasons\nBanks 18 ","Trump will leave---more likely now than ever.\nGardner 18 ("]
[null,null,null,"Trump’s withdrawing---but that can’t happen until 2020.\nAFP 17 "]

{"sheet":"Adv CP","index":8,"n_rows":32,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":32,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Open borders solves better – gives all migrants rights ",null,"pdb"]
["CP solves---the US has the capacity for resettlement---solves extremism",1]
["Last plank solves nuclear terrorism --- bolsters IAEA effectiveness and leads to international spillover ",null,"perm and planks"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Conditionality is a voting issue—it causes 2AC strategy skew and guts advocacy skills via the introduction of contradictory positions—the neg gets 1 condo","logic, plan good, critical thinknig, best args, real wrold, left and right neg flex, aff side bias, key to tnew affs, not a voter, impossible ,tradeoff with substnace, one condo doesn't solve because planks and kicking"]
[null,null,null,"RANT all other theory"]
[null,null,"No retal plank is a voting issue: it’s object fiat and not predictable, makes it impossible to be aff by fiating our impacts don’t happen—reject the team"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Reactors plank doesn’t solve nuke terror—stolen materials are a huge alt cause, that’s Arguello and Buis"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Other planks don’t solve refugee crisis: 1, instability from resource capabilities still exacerbate so instability scenarios are still inev and 2, still violates non-refoulment that says refugees shouldn’t be rejected after being let in AND should be guaranteed somewhere reasonably close to home"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Doesn’t solve either of our advantages: both specify need of supreme court action on deference for a global signal to be modelled and solve burden-sharing"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"No solvency advocate’s a voting issue—lit can’t check, aff can’t prepare, object fiat cops since the neg can just counterplan any proposal off the top of their head—crushes fairness—counter-interp—get one that endorses all planks, k2 better legal education"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"pdb minus open borders"]
[]
[null,null,"open borders is bad for wages"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"key to econ"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"da impact"]

{"sheet":"Stare decisis DA","index":9,"n_rows":8,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":8,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["The plan’s change in precedent crushes stare decisis. ",null,"No link—stare decisis dictates the Court needs a special justification to ignore precedent—Sweeney proves our justification is Congressional intent, so it’s not what Mills calls “mere disagreement”—their ev—wake=yellow"]
["Predictable court is key to growth. ",1]
["Escalates to global war."]
[null,null,"Overruling of precedent is inevitable under Roberts---reversals happen all the time aff not key"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"their I/l is about RoL-we solve better"]

{"sheet":"chevron da","index":10,"n_rows":11,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":11,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["1NC",null,"2AC","2NC","1AR","2NR","2AR"]
["Granting exceptions to Chevron’s application erodes the framework ",null,"No link---make them prove case uq causes spillover"]
["The net-benefit is high-tech regulation – agency flexibility is key"]
["The net-benefit is high-tech regulation – agency flexibility is key"]
[null,null,"The doctrine’s resilient and inevitably shifts"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"More restrictive AI regulations are inevitable due to concerns about the tech- makes their impact inevitable "]
[]
[]
[null,null,"The Court already weakened Chevron \nSapper 18\n"]

{"sheet":"Macros","index":11,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["Command","Function "]
["Control+Shift+N","Auto-Numbers"]
[]
["Control + I ","Add Row "]
[]
["control + b","Group Selection "]
[]
["control + shift + b","Undo Group Selection "]
[]
["Control + S ","New Sheet "]
[]
["Control + L ","5 spaces down "]
[]
["Control + K ","5 spaces up"]
[]
["Control + Pageup","Next Sheet to the left"]
[]
["Control + Pagedown ","Next Sheet to the Right "]